![]() Many modern microservice deployments use Wildfly.Īnother key difference between Tomcat and JBoss is the fact that Red Hat provides paid vendor support for its EAP offering. Enterprises can use the uncertified Wildfly product in production without the need to purchase a subscription license from Red Hat. JBoss is built on the open source project called Wildfly, which also has an LGPL. "But for developers or for evaluation purposes you can certainly download JBoss EAP off of the developer website at Red Hat." "If you want to use JBoss for production, then you would buy a subscription," said James Falkner, technical product manager with Red Hat Runtimes. The Apache license is not copyleft.įurthermore, while JBoss EAP is open source and LGPL-licensed, JBoss Enterprise Middleware requires a support subscription. Tomcat is part of the Apache license, which lets users distribute or modify the software without restriction. Teams that use JBoss must distribute derivatives of LGPL software with the same license. JBoss uses the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), also known as a copyleft license. There is one notable difference between the two servers: JBoss and Tomcat have different licensing models. A separate Apache project named TomEE allows for this support, but the basic Apache Tomcat download does not. However, it is possible to add support for APIs such as JSF and CDI to Tomcat by integrating projects like Weld and Mojarra. JBoss has existing support for all of these APIs. It lacks inherent support for many useful enterprise development APIs such as CDI, Java Transaction API, JavaServer Faces (JSF), Hibernate and JPA. Tomcat isn't Java EE Web Profile compliant either. Tomcat also supports a few complementary APIs such as WebSockets, the Java Authentication Service Provider Interface for Containers and the expression language API. Tomcat's primary focus is to provide an implementation of the Servlet and JSP specification. In contrast, Tomcat is simply a Servlet engine. JBoss not only provides support for the Servlet and Java Server Page (JSP) specification, but also support for JAX-RS web services, Contexts and Dependency Injection (CDI), Java Message Service, JavaMail and Java Naming and Directory Interface. JBoss comparison is that JBoss is a certified Java EE compliant application server. The most significant difference in a Tomcat vs. JBoss comparison, including functionality, tooling, licensing, community support and the various Java APIs in use. There are many factors to weigh in a Tomcat vs. Both servers can handle development and production, but how do you pick the one that's right for you? Thank you for taking the time to read this.Two of the most widely used Java application servers today are Apache Tomcat and Red Hat's JBoss Enterprise Application Platform. So, how could I setup ehCache on Tomcat 7 as a separate app with REST & SOAP support? (2) My requirements are to setup ehCache (with REST support) on Tomcat 7. If I my answers to my own question are correct, then that means, I should just use the standalone server? Whereas, ehcache-standalone-server-1.0.0 (comes with an embedded Glassfish server and has support for REST & SOAP) can be used to run as a standalone server. ![]() But it doesn't seem that it has support for Restful web services. It seems the ehcache-2.6.2 contains src and binaries, which essentially enables one to bundle it with their webapps (by putting the compiled jar or binaries inside the webapp's WEB-INF/lib folder). (1) What is the difference between the two? Never used ehCache before so I am having some issues deciding on which bundle to use. The data can be stored in-memory or via the filesystem. My requirements consist of using ehCache to send and store data via RESTful web service calls.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |